site by RobinHoodSEO aka spiney

Share on facebook


We have 43 guests online


followseo bookrobinhoodseohaaaaa

 

 

September Clues PDF E-mail
Written by spiney   
Saturday, 03 January 2009 01:12
Share Link
Google Yahoo Spurl Blogmarks Blinklist Reddit Digg Del.icio.us Pownce Facebook Ma.gnolia Pusha Furl Technorati Fark Stumble Upon Newsvine Diigo Mister Wong
The myriad of theories surrounding 9/11 have served the perpetrators well for over 7 years, giving the false impression freedom of speech was alive and well but ultimately spreading an almost mindnumbing confusion.
Most "911truth" organizations are run by the same people who organised this sham. This in order to 'control' the opposition, for as long as possible, in the hope it would all fade away one day in the public consciousness.

As most theories have built on the false assumption that airplanes were involved, the 'plane' myth has held strong - in spite of the widespread understanding no airliners crashed at the Pentagon or in Shanksville.
The misheld belief that 'thousands of Newyorkers' saw passenger planes crash into the twin towers is upheld solely by the relentless pounding of the mainstream media, the higher levels of which have complied to the requirements of this military false-flag operation.

Virtually all firsthand witnesses to the first "plane" were newspeople as shown in SEPTEMBER CLUES part D. As for the second "plane", MOST witnesses on the street reported 'a SMALL PLANE' or even 'A MISSILE' . These reports were actually aired on the day but never again. Of course, a plane-shaped cruise missile with wings and tail section (such as a JASSM cruise missile) would be perceived as a 'small plane' to most people : in fact, a study of 12000 pages of testimonies has determined that the majority of eyewitnesses reported a small aircraft - NOT a large airliner.

In SEPTEMBER CLUES part F we see that the alleged authors of the "amateur" videos ALSO were people linked to the newsmedia / film and video industry. All of those clips are, by now, proven forgeries : Many turn out to be simply cropped duplicates of the same composite, while most disqualify each other by the way of unconcilable differences : trajectories, angles, pitch, yaw, speeds, lighting, hues - to name a few. The few clips showing the actual 'plane' penetration depict a wide body (aluminum) airliner penetrating the steel-frame tower effortlessly without even the brittle tail section breaking off. This is of course utterly absurd and makes a joke of the laws of physics.

The current reluctance of most people to recognize and accept this research is - in many ways - understandable, the foremost cause being the massive conditioning power of the mainstream newsmedia.

However, the many mistakes made by the authors of these crude fabrications (which included digital simulations of the Manhattan landscape) will not stand the test of time. This branch of 9/11 truth research is naturally being vigorously attacked and billed as "disinformation" - as it contains the only tangible and repeatable proof of this murderous hoax : with no rubble to analyze and only speculation to go on, no one is going to prove HOW 3 towers collapsed nor IF or WHY a Norad standdown was ordered. On the other hand, the evidence of TV fakery cannot be suppressed no matter how hard the perpetrators may try.



< Prev   Next >
Last Updated ( Saturday, 03 January 2009 01:15 )